Ultra 9 295HX vs EPYC Embedded 9354P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Genoa (2022−2023) | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) |
| Release date | 14 March 2023 (2 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
EPYC Embedded 9354P and Core Ultra 9 295HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 3.25 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | no data |
| Die size | 8x 72 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 52,560 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 9354P and Core Ultra 9 295HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | SP5 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 9354P and Core Ultra 9 295HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 9354P and Core Ultra 9 295HX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 9354P and Core Ultra 9 295HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 9354P and Core Ultra 9 295HX.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 32 | 24 |
| Threads | 64 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 55 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 9354P has 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.
Ultra 9 295HX, on the other hand, has 409.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC Embedded 9354P and Intel Core Ultra 9 295HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC Embedded 9354P is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 295HX is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
