Athlon 1266 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking218not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency7.36no data
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Thunderbird C (2000−2001)
Release date18 September 2023 (2 years ago)21 March 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

EPYC Embedded 8224P and Athlon 1266 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads481
Base clock speed2.55 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.27 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256 KB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography5 nm180 nm
Die size2x 73 mm2120 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors17,750 million37 million
64 bit support+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC Embedded 8224P and Athlon 1266 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP6A
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt66 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 8224P and Athlon 1266. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 8224P and Athlon 1266 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 8224P and Athlon 1266. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR1 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 8224P and Athlon 1266.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes96no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 September 2023 21 March 2001
Physical cores 24 1
Threads 48 1
Chip lithography 5 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 66 Watt

EPYC Embedded 8224P has an age advantage of 22 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 1266, on the other hand, has 142.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P and AMD Athlon 1266. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC Embedded 8224P is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 1266 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P
EPYC Embedded 8224P
AMD Athlon 1266
Athlon 1266

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 8224P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Athlon 1266 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC Embedded 8224P and Athlon 1266, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.