Athlon XP-M 1000 vs EPYC Embedded 3451
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC Embedded | AMD Athlon XP-M |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (8 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $880 | no data |
Detailed specifications
EPYC Embedded 3451 and Athlon XP-M 1000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.15 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 200 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 21.5 | 10 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 2x 213 mm2 | 85 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 37 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 3451 and Athlon XP-M 1000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | AMD BGA SP4r2 | Socket 563 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 16 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 3451 and Athlon XP-M 1000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 3451 and Athlon XP-M 1000 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 3451 and Athlon XP-M 1000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TiB | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 3451 and Athlon XP-M 1000.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 64 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 16 | 1 |
| Threads | 32 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 16 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3451 has 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon XP-M 1000, on the other hand, has 525% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC Embedded 3451 and AMD Athlon XP-M 1000. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC Embedded 3451 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon XP-M 1000 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
