A6-9200 SoC vs EPYC Embedded 3401
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC Embedded | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (8 years ago) | 31 May 2016 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
EPYC Embedded 3401 and A6-9200 SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.85 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Multiplier | 18.5 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1536 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 9600 Million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 3401 and A6-9200 SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FT4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 3401 and A6-9200 SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 3401 and A6-9200 SoC are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 3401 and A6-9200 SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon R4 2CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 3401 and A6-9200 SoC.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 31 May 2016 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 10 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3401 has an age advantage of 1 year, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
A6-9200 SoC, on the other hand, has 750% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC Embedded 3401 and AMD A6-9200 SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC Embedded 3401 is a server/workstation processor while A6-9200 SoC is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
