Xeon 6746E vs EPYC Embedded 3301
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC Embedded | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) | 3 June 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $450 | $5,929 |
Detailed specifications
EPYC Embedded 3301 and Xeon 6746E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 112 |
| Threads | 12 | 112 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | 20 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1152 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 96 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 84 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9600 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 3301 and Xeon 6746E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
| Socket | no data | FCLGA4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 250 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 3301 and Xeon 6746E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
EPYC Embedded 3301 and Xeon 6746E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 3301 and Xeon 6746E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 3301 and Xeon 6746E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-6400 |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TiB | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 3301 and Xeon 6746E.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 88 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 3 June 2024 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 112 |
| Threads | 12 | 112 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 250 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3301 has 284.6% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6746E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and 833.3% more physical cores and 833.3% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC Embedded 3301 and Intel Xeon 6746E. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
