Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs EPYC Embedded 3301
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 73 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC Embedded | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Power efficiency | no data | 16.28 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) | 8 March 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $450 | no data |
Detailed specifications
EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Multiplier | 20 | 36 |
| L1 cache | 1152 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 4x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9600 Million | 16,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | WRX8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TiB | 2 TiB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 8 March 2022 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 32 |
| Threads | 12 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 280 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3301 has 330.8% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC Embedded 3301 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
