Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs EPYC Embedded 3301
Primary details
Comparing EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 521 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC Embedded | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 47.66 |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024) |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) | 1 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $450 | no data |
Detailed specifications
EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 54 MHz |
| Multiplier | 20 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1152 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 9600 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | no data | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 880M |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 1 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 28 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3301 has 50% more physical cores.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 33.3% more threads, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC Embedded 3301 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC Embedded 3301 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
