Ryzen 5 PRO 230 vs EPYC Embedded 3251
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 799 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC Embedded | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $315 | no data |
Detailed specifications
EPYC Embedded 3251 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Multiplier | 25 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 3251 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | TR4 | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 6 MB + 16 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 3251 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 3251 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 3251 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 512 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 6 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3251 has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
Ryzen 5 PRO 230, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC Embedded 3251 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC Embedded 3251 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
