i5-8650K vs EPYC Embedded 3251
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD EPYC Embedded | Intel Core i5 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (8 years ago) | 1 September 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $315 | no data |
Detailed specifications
EPYC Embedded 3251 and Core i5-8650K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 25 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 9 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 126 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 3251 and Core i5-8650K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | TR4 | 1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 3251 and Core i5-8650K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 3251 and Core i5-8650K are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 3251 and Core i5-8650K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 512 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 3251 and Core i5-8650K.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 1 September 2018 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 95 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3251 has 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and 90% lower power consumption.
i5-8650K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC Embedded 3251 and Intel Core i5-8650K. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC Embedded 3251 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-8650K is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
