Atom x7211RE vs EPYC Embedded 3251
Primary details
Comparing EPYC Embedded 3251 and Atom x7211RE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC Embedded | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Amston Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $315 | $42 |
Detailed specifications
EPYC Embedded 3251 and Atom x7211RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Multiplier | 25 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 3251 and Atom x7211RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | TR4 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 3251 and Atom x7211RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 3251 and Atom x7211RE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 3251 and Atom x7211RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 512 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 16EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 3251 and Atom x7211RE.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 6 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3251 has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
Atom x7211RE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC Embedded 3251 and Atom x7211RE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC Embedded 3251 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7211RE is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC Embedded 3251 and Atom x7211RE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
