Xeon D-2843NT vs EPYC Embedded 3201
Primary details
Comparing EPYC Embedded 3201 and Xeon D-2843NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC Embedded | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | no data |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) | 1 October 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
EPYC Embedded 3201 and Xeon D-2843NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 15 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | no data |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 3201 and Xeon D-2843NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | AMD BGA SP4r2 | FCBGA2579 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 3201 and Xeon D-2843NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
EPYC Embedded 3201 and Xeon D-2843NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 3201 and Xeon D-2843NT are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 3201 and Xeon D-2843NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2133 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 512 GB | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.13 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 3201 and Xeon D-2843NT.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 32 | 32 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 1 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 10 |
| Threads | 8 | 20 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 80 Watt |
We couldn't decide between EPYC Embedded 3201 and Xeon D-2843NT. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC Embedded 3201 and Xeon D-2843NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
