Processor N250 vs EPYC Embedded 3201
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC Embedded | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Twin Lake (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) | 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
EPYC Embedded 3201 and Processor N250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Multiplier | 15 | no data |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4800 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 3201 and Processor N250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AMD BGA SP4r2 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 3201 and Processor N250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
EPYC Embedded 3201 and Processor N250 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 3201 and Processor N250 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 3201 and Processor N250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2133 | DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 512 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.13 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 730 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 3201 and Processor N250.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 32 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 7 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 6 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3201 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Processor N250, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 and Intel Processor N250. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC Embedded 3201 is a server/workstation processor while Processor N250 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
