Ultra 5 250K Plus vs EPYC Embedded 2875
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Grado (2025) | Arrow Lake Refresh (2026) |
| Release date | 9 December 2025 (less than a year ago) | 11 March 2026 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $199 |
Detailed specifications
EPYC Embedded 2875 and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 18 (Octadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 18 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 30 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 70.6 mm2 | 243 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 16,630 million | 17,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 2875 and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FL1 | 1851 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 2875 and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC Embedded 2875 and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 2875 and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 2875 and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 2875 and Core Ultra 5 250K Plus.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 28 | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 9 December 2025 | 11 March 2026 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 18 |
| Threads | 32 | 18 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 125 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 2875 has 77.8% more threads, and 66.7% lower power consumption.
Ultra 5 250K Plus, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, 12.5% more physical cores, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC Embedded 2875 and Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC Embedded 2875 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 250K Plus is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
