3 304 vs EPYC Embedded 2875
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Grado (2025) | Wildcat Lake (2026) |
| Release date | 9 December 2025 (less than a year ago) | 16 April 2026 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $309 |
Detailed specifications
EPYC Embedded 2875 and Core 3 304 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 5 (Penta-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 5 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 70.6 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 16,630 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 2875 and Core 3 304 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FL1 | Intel BGA 1516 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 2875 and Core 3 304. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC Embedded 2875 and Core 3 304 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 2875 and Core 3 304 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 2875 and Core 3 304. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 2875 and Core 3 304.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 28 | 6 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 9 December 2025 | 16 April 2026 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 5 |
| Threads | 32 | 5 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 2875 has 220% more physical cores and 540% more threads.
Core 3 304, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, a 33% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC Embedded 2875 and Intel Core 3 304. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC Embedded 2875 is a server/workstation processor while Core 3 304 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
