Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE vs EPYC 9965

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency7.74no data
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameTurin (2024)Gorgon Point (2026)
Release date10 October 2024 (1 year ago)2 March 2026 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,813no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9965 and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1926 (Hexa-Core)
Threads38412
Base clock speed2.25 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache384 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography3 nm4 nm
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9965 and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5AM5
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9965 and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9965 and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9965 and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 840M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9965 and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes12810

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 October 2024 2 March 2026
Physical cores 192 6
Threads 384 12
Chip lithography 3 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 9965 has 3100% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 1328.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9965 and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 9965 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9965
EPYC 9965
AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE
Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 398 votes

Rate EPYC 9965 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 9965 and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435GE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.