Pentium 4 1.8 vs EPYC 9965

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency7.73no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameTurin (2024)Willamette (2000−2001)
Release date10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)2 July 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,813$562

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9965 and Pentium 4 1.8 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1921 (Single-Core)
Threads3841
Base clock speed2.25 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)8 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256 KB
L3 cache384 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography3 nm180 nm
Die sizeno data217 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistorsno data42 million
64 bit support+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9965 and Pentium 4 1.8 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5423
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt67 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9965 and Pentium 4 1.8. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9965 and Pentium 4 1.8 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9965 and Pentium 4 1.8. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9965 and Pentium 4 1.8.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 October 2024 2 July 2001
Physical cores 192 1
Threads 384 1
Chip lithography 3 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 67 Watt

EPYC 9965 has an age advantage of 23 years, 19100% more physical cores and 38300% more threads, and a 5900% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium 4 1.8, on the other hand, has 646.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9965 and Intel Pentium 4 1.8. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 9965 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium 4 1.8 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9965
EPYC 9965
Intel Pentium 4 1.8
Pentium 4 1.8

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 327 votes

Rate EPYC 9965 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Pentium 4 1.8 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 9965 and Pentium 4 1.8, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.