Athlon 1200 (C) vs EPYC 9965
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 7.74 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Turin (2024) | Thunderbird C (2000−2001) |
| Release date | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 31 October 2000 (24 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $14,813 | $673 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9965 and Athlon 1200 (C) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 192 | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 384 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.25 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 384 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 120 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 37 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9965 and Athlon 1200 (C) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP5 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 500 Watt | 66 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9965 and Athlon 1200 (C). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9965 and Athlon 1200 (C) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9965 and Athlon 1200 (C). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR1 Depends on motherboard |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9965 and Athlon 1200 (C).
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 October 2024 | 31 October 2000 |
| Physical cores | 192 | 1 |
| Threads | 384 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 500 Watt | 66 Watt |
EPYC 9965 has an age advantage of 23 years, 19100% more physical cores and 38300% more threads, and a 5900% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon 1200 (C), on the other hand, has 657.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9965 and AMD Athlon 1200 (C). We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 9965 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 1200 (C) is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
