Xeon 6353P vs EPYC 9845

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9845 and Xeon 6353P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.61no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency23.01no data
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameTurin (2024)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)24 February 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$13,564$426

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9845 and Xeon 6353P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1608 (Octa-Core)
Threads32016
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache320 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9845 and Xeon 6353P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP51700
Power consumption (TDP)390 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9845 and Xeon 6353P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 9845 and Xeon 6353P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9845 and Xeon 6353P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9845 and Xeon 6353P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9845 and Xeon 6353P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 October 2024 24 February 2025
Physical cores 160 8
Threads 320 16
Chip lithography 3 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 390 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 9845 has 1900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon 6353P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9845 and Intel Xeon 6353P. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9845
EPYC 9845
Intel Xeon 6353P
Xeon 6353P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 9845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6353P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 9845 and Xeon 6353P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.