5 223PQE vs EPYC 9825
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Turin (2024) | Bartlett Lake (2026) |
| Release date | 10 October 2024 (1 year ago) | 9 March 2026 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $13,006 | $319 |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9825 and Core 5 223PQE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 144 | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 288 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 384 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9825 and Core 5 223PQE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP5 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 390 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9825 and Core 5 223PQE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 9825 and Core 5 223PQE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9825 and Core 5 223PQE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9825 and Core 5 223PQE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9825 and Core 5 223PQE.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 October 2024 | 9 March 2026 |
| Physical cores | 144 | 8 |
| Threads | 288 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 390 Watt | 125 Watt |
EPYC 9825 has 1700% more physical cores and 1700% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.
5 223PQE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 212% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9825 and Intel Core 5 223PQE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 9825 is a server/workstation processor while Core 5 223PQE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
