Xeon Gold 5512U vs EPYC 9754

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
65.64
+66.4%
Xeon Gold 5512U
2023
28 cores / 56 threads, 185 Watt
39.44

EPYC 9754 outperforms Xeon Gold 5512U by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and Xeon Gold 5512U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1178
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0796.53
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency16.6319.44
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900$1,230

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5512U has 8921% better value for money than EPYC 9754.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and Xeon Gold 5512U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12828 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads25656
Base clock speed2.25 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)52.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size8x 73 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data89 °C
Number of transistors71,000 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and Xeon Gold 5512U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Gold 5512U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 9754 and Xeon Gold 5512U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Gold 5512U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Gold 5512U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Gold 5512U.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 65.64
+66.4%
Xeon Gold 5512U 39.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
+66.4%
Xeon Gold 5512U 60365

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 65.64 39.44
Recency 13 June 2023 14 December 2023
Physical cores 128 28
Threads 256 56
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 185 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 66.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 357.1% more physical cores and 357.1% more threads.

Xeon Gold 5512U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 94.6% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5512U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Xeon Gold 5512U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
Intel Xeon Gold 5512U
Xeon Gold 5512U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 36 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5512U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or Xeon Gold 5512U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.