Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs EPYC 9754

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
63.25
+54.7%
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
40.89

EPYC 9754 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 3970X by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1054
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.6224.27
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameBergamoMatisse (2019−2020)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)7 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999
Current price$7724 $1605 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has 425% better value for money than EPYC 9754.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12832 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads25664
Base clock speed2.25 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus supportno data8 × 16 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)2 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)128 MB
Chip lithography5 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size8x 73 mm2no data
Number of transistors71,000 million23540 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP5TR4
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data102.403 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/A-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 63.25
+54.7%
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 40.89

EPYC 9754 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 3970X by 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 9754 97836
+54.7%
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 63241

EPYC 9754 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 3970X by 55% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.25 40.89
Recency 13 June 2023 7 November 2019
Physical cores 128 32
Threads 256 64
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9754 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 31 vote

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 343 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.