Ryzen Threadripper 2900X vs EPYC 9754
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 34 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.17 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 16.63 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Bergamo (2023) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 13 June 2023 (2 years ago) | August 2018 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $11,900 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9754 and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 128 | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 256 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 2.25 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 32768 KB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 8x 73 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 71,000 million | 9600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9754 and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP5 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 360 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 128 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 360 Watt | 125 Watt |
EPYC 9754 has 1500% more physical cores, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen Threadripper 2900X, on the other hand, has 188% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9754 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2900X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 9754 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 2900X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
