Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs EPYC 9754

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
63.24
+221%
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
19.68

EPYC 9754 outperforms Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 by a whopping 221% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12291
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.09no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency16.6234.49
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12812 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads25624
Base clock speed2.25 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)12 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die size8x 73 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors71,000 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP5FP8
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 63.24
+221%
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
+221%
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 31255

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.24 19.68
Recency 13 June 2023 25 July 2024
Physical cores 128 12
Threads 256 24
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 54 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 221.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 966.7% more physical cores and 966.7% more threads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9754 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.