Core i5-9600K vs EPYC 9754
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9754 outperforms i5-9600K by a whopping 817% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 9754 and Core i5-9600K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 10 | 951 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.62 | 11.89 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i5 |
| Architecture codename | Bergamo | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 13 June 2023 (1 year ago) | 19 October 2018 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $262 |
| Current price | $7724 | $204 (0.8x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i5-9600K has 157% better value for money than EPYC 9754.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9754 and Core i5-9600K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 128 | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 256 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 2.25 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 9 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 8x 73 mm2 | 149 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 71,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9754 and Core i5-9600K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP5 | FCLGA1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 360 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Core i5-9600K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| SIPP | no data | + |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
EPYC 9754 and Core i5-9600K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| MPX | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Core i5-9600K are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Core i5-9600K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 41.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| Max video memory | no data | 64 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.15 GHz |
| InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 9754 and Core i5-9600K integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 9754 and Core i5-9600K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2304@24Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096 x 2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096 x 2304@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by EPYC 9754 and Core i5-9600K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Core i5-9600K.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
EPYC 9754 outperforms Core i5-9600K by 817% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
EPYC 9754 outperforms Core i5-9600K by 817% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 63.25 | 6.90 |
| Recency | 13 June 2023 | 19 October 2018 |
| Physical cores | 128 | 6 |
| Threads | 256 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 360 Watt | 95 Watt |
The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-9600K in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 9754 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-9600K is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Core i5-9600K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
