Athlon Gold 3150U vs EPYC 9754

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
65.64
+2415%

EPYC 9754 outperforms Athlon Gold 3150U by a whopping 2415% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and Athlon Gold 3150U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking111739
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.03no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Power efficiency16.6315.87
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and Athlon Gold 3150U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1282 (Dual-core)
Threads2564
Base clock speed2.25 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography5 nm14 nm
Die size8x 73 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors71,000 million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and Athlon Gold 3150U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP5FP5
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Athlon Gold 3150U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Athlon Gold 3150U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Athlon Gold 3150U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Athlon Gold 3150U.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes12812

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 65.64
+2415%
Athlon Gold 3150U 2.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
+2419%
Athlon Gold 3150U 3988

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 65.64 2.61
Recency 13 June 2023 6 January 2020
Physical cores 128 2
Threads 256 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 2414.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 6300% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon Gold 3150U, on the other hand, has 2300% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Gold 3150U in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9754 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon Gold 3150U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Athlon Gold 3150U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
Athlon Gold 3150U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 36 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 901 vote

Rate Athlon Gold 3150U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or Athlon Gold 3150U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.