Xeon w5-3535X vs EPYC 9734
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 9734 and Xeon w5-3535X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Architecture codename | Bergamo (2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
Release date | 13 June 2023 (1 year ago) | 24 August 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $9,600 | $1,689 |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9734 and Xeon w5-3535X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 112 | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
Threads | 224 | 40 |
Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 52.5 MB |
Chip lithography | 5 nm | Intel 7 nm |
Die size | 8x 73 mm2 | 4x 477 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 76 °C |
Number of transistors | 71,000 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9734 and Xeon w5-3535X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
Socket | SP5 | FCLGA4677 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 340 Watt | 300 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9734 and Xeon w5-3535X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
EPYC 9734 and Xeon w5-3535X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
SGX | no data | - |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9734 and Xeon w5-3535X are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9734 and Xeon w5-3535X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5-4800 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9734 and Xeon w5-3535X.
PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 128 | 112 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 13 June 2023 | 24 August 2024 |
Physical cores | 112 | 20 |
Threads | 224 | 40 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 340 Watt | 300 Watt |
EPYC 9734 has 460% more physical cores and 460% more threads.
Xeon w5-3535X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 13.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 9734 and Xeon w5-3535X. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9734 and Xeon w5-3535X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.