Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 vs EPYC 9684X
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 9684X and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 6 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Transmeta Crusoe |
| Power efficiency | 17.96 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Genoa-X (2023) | Crusoe (2001) |
| Release date | 13 June 2023 (1 year ago) | 1 June 2001 (23 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $14,756 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9684X and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 96 | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 192 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.55 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 266 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 1152 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 12x 72 mm2 | 55 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 135,240 million | 36.8 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9684X and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | SP5 | CBGA-474 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9684X and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9684X and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9684X and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9684X and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 June 2023 | 1 June 2001 |
| Physical cores | 96 | 1 |
| Threads | 192 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 7 Watt |
EPYC 9684X has an age advantage of 22 years, 9500% more physical cores and 19100% more threads, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.
Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, on the other hand, has 5614.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 9684X and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 9684X is a server/workstation processor while Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9684X and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
