Atom x7433FE vs EPYC 9684X
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 19 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.02 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 18.53 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Genoa-X (2023) | Amston Lake (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 13 June 2023 (2 years ago) | 1 October 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $14,756 | $75 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9684X and Atom x7433FE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 96 | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 192 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.55 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 1152 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 12x 72 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 135,240 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9684X and Atom x7433FE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP5 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9684X and Atom x7433FE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9684X and Atom x7433FE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9684X and Atom x7433FE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel UHD Graphics 32EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9684X and Atom x7433FE.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 June 2023 | 1 October 2025 |
| Physical cores | 96 | 4 |
| Threads | 192 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 9 Watt |
EPYC 9684X has 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Atom x7433FE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 4344.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9684X and Intel Atom x7433FE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 9684X is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7433FE is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
