Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX vs EPYC 9655P
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX outperforms EPYC 9655P by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 4 | 1 |
| Place by popularity | 6 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.85 | 2.24 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 9.64 | 12.04 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Turin (2024) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| Release date | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 23 July 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $10,811 | $11,700 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 9655P has 27% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9655P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 96 | 96 |
| Threads | 192 | 192 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 384 MB (shared) | 384 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 12x 70.6 mm2 | 12x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 99,780 million | 99,780 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9655P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9655P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9655P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9655P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9655P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 136 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 91.54 | 100.00 |
| Recency | 10 October 2024 | 23 July 2025 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 350 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX has a 9.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and 14.3% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD EPYC 9655P and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
