Threadripper PRO 7995WX vs EPYC 9654P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9654P and Threadripper PRO 7995WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.90no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency18.86no data
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Storm Peak (2023)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$10,625no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9654P and Threadripper PRO 7995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores9696
Threads192192
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache6 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache96 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache384 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm5 nm
Die size12x 72 mm212x 71 mm2
Number of transistors78,840 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9654P and Threadripper PRO 7995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9654P and Threadripper PRO 7995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9654P and Threadripper PRO 7995WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9654P and Threadripper PRO 7995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9654P and Threadripper PRO 7995WX.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 350 Watt

Threadripper PRO 7995WX has 2.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 9654P and Threadripper PRO 7995WX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 9654P is a server/workstation processor while Threadripper PRO 7995WX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9654P and Threadripper PRO 7995WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9654P
AMD Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 109 votes

Rate Threadripper PRO 7995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9654P or Threadripper PRO 7995WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.