Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U vs EPYC 9654P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9654P
2022, $10,625
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
65.97
+527%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U by a whopping 527% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23846
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.22no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Power efficiency19.65no data
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Rembrandt-U Refresh (2023)
Release date10 November 2022 (3 years ago)5 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$10,625no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9654P and Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores968 (Octa-Core)
Threads19216
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.75 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache64K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache384 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm6 nm
Die size12x 72 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors78,840 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9654P and Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP5FP7
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt4 MB + 16 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9654P and Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9654P and Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9654P and Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9654P and Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 9654P 65.97
+527%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U 10.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 9654P 116324
+527%
Samples: 5
Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U 18555
Samples: 140

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 65.97 10.52
Recency 10 November 2022 5 January 2023
Physical cores 96 8
Threads 192 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 4 Watt

EPYC 9654P has a 527.1% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 8900% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 9654P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9654P is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9654P
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 10 votes

Rate EPYC 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 9654P and Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.