K6-2/400AHX vs EPYC 9654P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 19 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.21 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD EPYC | AMD K6-2 |
| Power efficiency | 7.77 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Genoa (2022−2023) | K6-2 (1998−1999) |
| Release date | 10 November 2022 (2 years ago) | 28 May 1998 (27 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $10,625 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9654P and K6-2/400AHX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 96 | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 192 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 99.99 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 24 | 4 |
| L1 cache | 6 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 96 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 384 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm, 6 nm | 0.25 µm |
| Die size | 12x 72 mm2 | 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 78,840 million | 9 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9654P and K6-2/400AHX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | SP5 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 360 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9654P and K6-2/400AHX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9654P and K6-2/400AHX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9654P and K6-2/400AHX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 6 TiB | 4 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9654P and K6-2/400AHX.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 November 2022 | 28 May 1998 |
| Physical cores | 96 | 1 |
| Threads | 192 | 1 |
EPYC 9654P has an age advantage of 24 years, and 9500% more physical cores and 19100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9654P and AMD K6-2/400AHX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 9654P is a server/workstation processor while K6-2/400AHX is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
