5 210H vs EPYC 9654P

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9654P and Core 5 210H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.01no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency18.96no data
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)18 December 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$10,625$342

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9654P and Core 5 210H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores968 (Octa-Core)
Threads19212
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache384 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm10 nm
Die size12x 72 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors78,840 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9654P and Core 5 210H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9654P and Core 5 210H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 9654P and Core 5 210H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9654P and Core 5 210H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9654P and Core 5 210H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIris Xe Graphics 48EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9654P and Core 5 210H.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes1288

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2022 18 December 2024
Physical cores 96 8
Threads 192 12
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 45 Watt

EPYC 9654P has 1100% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

5 210H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 700% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 9654P and Core 5 210H. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 9654P is a server/workstation processor while Core 5 210H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9654P and Core 5 210H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9654P
Intel Core 5 210H
Core 5 210H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 5 210H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9654P or Core 5 210H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.