Xeon Gold 5420+ vs EPYC 9654

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
75.70
+107%
Xeon Gold 5420+
2023
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
36.65

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon Gold 5420+ by a whopping 107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9654 and Xeon Gold 5420+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking695
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.3659.38
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency19.9016.92
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,805$1,848

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5420+ has 4266% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9654 and Xeon Gold 5420+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores9628 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads19256
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache384 MB (shared)52.5 MB
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm10 nm
Die size12x 72 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
Number of transistors78,840 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9654 and Xeon Gold 5420+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP54677
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9654 and Xeon Gold 5420+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 9654 and Xeon Gold 5420+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9654 and Xeon Gold 5420+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9654 and Xeon Gold 5420+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9654 and Xeon Gold 5420+.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9654 75.70
+107%
Xeon Gold 5420+ 36.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9654 120246
+107%
Xeon Gold 5420+ 58209

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 75.70 36.65
Recency 10 November 2022 10 January 2023
Physical cores 96 28
Threads 192 56
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 205 Watt

EPYC 9654 has a 106.5% higher aggregate performance score, 242.9% more physical cores and 242.9% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon Gold 5420+, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 75.6% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5420+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9654 and Xeon Gold 5420+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654
Intel Xeon Gold 5420+
Xeon Gold 5420+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 995 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 5420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9654 or Xeon Gold 5420+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.