Ultra 7 270HX Plus vs EPYC 9654

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2037
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.47no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency7.99no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Arrow Lake-HX Refresh (2026)
Release date10 November 2022 (3 years ago)17 March 2026 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,805no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9654 and Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores9620 (Icosa-Core)
Threads19220
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.3 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache64K (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache384 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm3 nm
Die size12x 72 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors78,840 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9654 and Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5Intel BGA 2114
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9654 and Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 9654 and Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9654 and Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9654 and Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9654 and Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12824

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2022 17 March 2026
Physical cores 96 20
Threads 192 20
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 55 Watt

EPYC 9654 has 380% more physical cores and 860% more threads.

Ultra 7 270HX Plus, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 554.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9654 and Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654
Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus
Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1009 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 9654 and Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.