Xeon 6774P vs EPYC 9634
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 6774P outperforms EPYC 9634 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 28 | 26 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.91 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 9.00 | 7.79 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Genoa (2022−2023) | no data |
| Release date | 10 November 2022 (3 years ago) | 1 April 2025 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $10,304 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of EPYC 9634 and Xeon 6774P: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 84 | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 168 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 2.25 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Multiplier | 22.5 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 384 MB (shared) | 336 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm, 6 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Die size | 12x 72 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 81 °C |
| Number of transistors | 78,840 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9634 and Xeon 6774P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | SP5 | FCLGA4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 290 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9634 and Xeon 6774P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
EPYC 9634 and Xeon 6774P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9634 and Xeon 6774P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9634 and Xeon 6774P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s) |
| Maximum memory size | 6 TiB | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9634 and Xeon 6774P.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 136 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 63.07 | 65.88 |
| Recency | 10 November 2022 | 1 April 2025 |
| Physical cores | 84 | 64 |
| Threads | 168 | 128 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 290 Watt | 350 Watt |
EPYC 9634 has 31% more physical cores and 31% more threads, and 21% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6774P, on the other hand, has a 4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD EPYC 9634 and Intel Xeon 6774P.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
