Ultra 7 265KF vs EPYC 9634

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9634 and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.07no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency22.18no data
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date10 November 2022 (1 year ago)24 October 2024
Launch price (MSRP)$10,304$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9634 and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8420 (Icosa-Core)
Threads16820
Base clock speed2.25 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.25 GHz5.5 GHz
Multiplier22.5no data
L1 cache5376 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache84 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache384 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm3 nm
Die size12x 72 mm2no data
Number of transistors78,840 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9634 and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP51851
Power consumption (TDP)290 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9634 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 9634 and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9634 and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9634 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9634 and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2022 24 October 2024
Physical cores 84 20
Threads 168 20
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 290 Watt 125 Watt

EPYC 9634 has 320% more physical cores and 740% more threads.

Ultra 7 265KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 132% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 9634 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 9634 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9634 and Core Ultra 7 265KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9634
EPYC 9634
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9634 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9634 or Core Ultra 7 265KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.