EPYC Embedded 2875 vs EPYC 9575F
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 8 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.83 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 8.91 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Turin (2024) | Grado (2025) |
| Release date | 10 October 2024 (1 year ago) | 9 December 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $11,791 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9575F and EPYC Embedded 2875 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 8x 70.6 mm2 | 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 66,520 million | 16,630 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9575F and EPYC Embedded 2875 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP5 | FL1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 75 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9575F and EPYC Embedded 2875. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9575F and EPYC Embedded 2875 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9575F and EPYC Embedded 2875. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9575F and EPYC Embedded 2875.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 28 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 October 2024 | 9 December 2025 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 16 |
| Threads | 128 | 32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 75 Watt |
EPYC 9575F has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
EPYC Embedded 2875, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 433.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9575F and AMD EPYC Embedded 2875. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
