Apple M4 Max (14 cores) vs EPYC 9575F

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9575F
2024
64 cores / 128 threads, 400 Watt
93.90
+106%
Apple M4 Max (14 cores)
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 80 Watt
45.54

EPYC 9575F outperforms Apple M4 Max (14 cores) by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking452
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.74no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M4
Power efficiency22.4954.53
DesignerAMDApple
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameTurin (2024)no data
Release date10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)30 November 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,791no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9575F and M4 Max (14 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads12814
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5 GHz4.51 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache256 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography4 nm3 nm
Die size8x 70.6 mm2no data
Number of transistors66,520 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9575F and M4 Max (14 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP5no data
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9575F and M4 Max (14 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9575F and M4 Max (14 cores) are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9575F and M4 Max (14 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M4 32-core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9575F and M4 Max (14 cores).

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 93.90 45.54
Recency 10 October 2024 30 November 2024
Physical cores 64 14
Threads 128 14
Chip lithography 4 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 80 Watt

EPYC 9575F has a 106.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 357.1% more physical cores and 814.3% more threads.

Apple M4 Max (14 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 9575F is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M4 Max (14 cores) in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9575F is a server/workstation processor while Apple M4 Max (14 cores) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9575F
EPYC 9575F
Apple M4 Max (14 cores)
M4 Max (14 cores)

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 5 votes

Rate EPYC 9575F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 55 votes

Rate M4 Max (14 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 9575F and M4 Max (14 cores), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.