Xeon Platinum 8592+ vs EPYC 9554

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9554
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 360 Watt
70.64
+33.1%
Xeon Platinum 8592+
2023
64 cores / 128 threads, 350 Watt
53.09

EPYC 9554 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8592+ by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9554 and Xeon Platinum 8592+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking826
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.981.73
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency18.4914.29
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,087$11,600

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9554 has 72% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8592+.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9554 and Xeon Platinum 8592+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads128128
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache4 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache64 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)320 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm10 nm
Die size8x 72 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors52,560 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9554 and Xeon Platinum 8592+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP54677
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9554 and Xeon Platinum 8592+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 9554 and Xeon Platinum 8592+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9554 and Xeon Platinum 8592+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9554 and Xeon Platinum 8592+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9554 and Xeon Platinum 8592+.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9554 70.64
+33.1%
Xeon Platinum 8592+ 53.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9554 111794
+33.1%
Xeon Platinum 8592+ 84013

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 70.64 53.09
Recency 10 November 2022 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 350 Watt

EPYC 9554 has a 33.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon Platinum 8592+, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 2.9% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9554 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8592+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9554 and Xeon Platinum 8592+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9554
EPYC 9554
Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+
Xeon Platinum 8592+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 9554 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 9 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8592 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9554 or Xeon Platinum 8592+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.