Xeon 6710E vs EPYC 9534

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9534
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
50.70
+45.1%

EPYC 9534 outperforms Xeon 6710E by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking43107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.9312.97
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency7.657.20
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Sierra Forest (2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)3 June 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,803$2,749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6710E has 343% better value for money than EPYC 9534.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9534 and Xeon 6710E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads12864
Base clock speed2.45 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier24.5no data
L1 cache64K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)4 MB (per module)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)96 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size8x 72 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
Number of transistors52,560 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9534 and Xeon 6710E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9534 and Xeon 6710E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 9534 and Xeon 6710E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9534 and Xeon 6710E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9534 and Xeon 6710E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size6 TiB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9534 and Xeon 6710E.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12888

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 9534 50.70
+45.1%
Xeon 6710E 34.95

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 9534 Samples: 8 89077
+45.1%
Xeon 6710E Samples: 1 61404

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 50.70 34.95
Recency 10 November 2022 3 June 2024
Threads 128 64
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 205 Watt

EPYC 9534 has a 45.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Xeon 6710E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 36.6% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 9534 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 6710E in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9534
EPYC 9534
Intel Xeon 6710E
Xeon 6710E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9534 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon 6710E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 9534 and Xeon 6710E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.