Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX vs EPYC 9474F
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 18 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.72 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 17.49 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Genoa (2022−2023) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| Release date | 10 November 2022 (2 years ago) | July 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $6,780 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9474F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 96 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 36 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm, 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 8x 72 mm2 | 4x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 52,560 million | 33,260 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9474F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 360 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9474F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9474F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9474F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 6 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9474F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 48 | 24 |
| Threads | 96 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 360 Watt | 350 Watt |
EPYC 9474F has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 2.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9474F and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
