i9-14900K vs EPYC 9474F

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9474F
2022
48 cores / 96 threads, 360 Watt
66.11
+74.8%
Core i9-14900K
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
37.83

EPYC 9474F outperforms Core i9-14900K by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9474F and Core i9-14900K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1180
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.5864.75
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency17.3828.64
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,780$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-14900K has 1060% better value for money than EPYC 9474F.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9474F and Core i9-14900K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads9632
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.8 GHz
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache3 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache48 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size8x 72 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors52,560 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9474F and Core i9-14900K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9474F and Core i9-14900K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 9474F and Core i9-14900K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9474F and Core i9-14900K are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9474F and Core i9-14900K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiB192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 9474F and Core i9-14900K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 9474F and Core i9-14900K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 9474F and Core i9-14900K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9474F and Core i9-14900K.

PCIe version5.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9474F 66.11
+74.8%
i9-14900K 37.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9474F 105010
+74.8%
i9-14900K 60089

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 66.11 37.83
Recency 10 November 2022 17 October 2023
Physical cores 48 24
Threads 96 32
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 125 Watt

EPYC 9474F has a 74.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

i9-14900K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 188% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9474F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-14900K in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9474F is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-14900K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9474F and Core i9-14900K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9474F
EPYC 9474F
Intel Core i9-14900K
Core i9-14900K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 19 votes

Rate EPYC 9474F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1729 votes

Rate Core i9-14900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9474F or Core i9-14900K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.