Pentium Dual-Core E2210 vs EPYC 9455P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9455P outperforms Pentium Dual-Core E2210 by a whopping 16600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 23 | 3285 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 11.73 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 9.40 | 0.26 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Turin (2024) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| Release date | 10 October 2024 (1 year ago) | 1 June 2009 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,819 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9455P and Pentium Dual-Core E2210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 96 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.15 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 8x 70.6 mm2 | 82 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 66,520 million | 228 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9455P and Pentium Dual-Core E2210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP5 | 775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9455P and Pentium Dual-Core E2210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9455P and Pentium Dual-Core E2210 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9455P and Pentium Dual-Core E2210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9455P and Pentium Dual-Core E2210.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 66.80 | 0.40 |
| Recency | 10 October 2024 | 1 June 2009 |
| Physical cores | 48 | 2 |
| Threads | 96 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 65 Watt |
EPYC 9455P has a 16600% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium Dual-Core E2210, on the other hand, has 362% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 9455P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2210 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 9455P is a server/workstation processor while Pentium Dual-Core E2210 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
