i3-2355M vs EPYC 9455P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 23 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 11.73 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i3 |
| Power efficiency | 9.40 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Turin (2024) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 10 October 2024 (1 year ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,819 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9455P and Core i3-2355M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 96 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.15 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 13 |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 3 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 8x 70.6 mm2 | 149 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 66,520 million | 624 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9455P and Core i3-2355M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | SP5 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9455P and Core i3-2355M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9455P and Core i3-2355M are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9455P and Core i3-2355M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3-1333 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9455P and Core i3-2355M.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 48 | 2 |
| Threads | 96 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 17 Watt |
EPYC 9455P has 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
i3-2355M, on the other hand, has 1665% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9455P and Intel Core i3-2355M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 9455P is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-2355M is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
