Core 2 Quad Q7600 vs EPYC 9455P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 23 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 11.73 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 9.40 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Turin (2024) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
| Release date | 10 October 2024 (1 year ago) | 31 August 2009 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,819 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9455P and Core 2 Quad Q7600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 96 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.15 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 8x 70.6 mm2 | 2x 82 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 71 °C |
| Number of transistors | 66,520 million | 456 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9455P and Core 2 Quad Q7600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP5 | 775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9455P and Core 2 Quad Q7600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9455P and Core 2 Quad Q7600 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9455P and Core 2 Quad Q7600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9455P and Core 2 Quad Q7600.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 October 2024 | 31 August 2009 |
| Physical cores | 48 | 4 |
| Threads | 96 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 95 Watt |
EPYC 9455P has an age advantage of 15 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.
Core 2 Quad Q7600, on the other hand, has 216% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9455P and Intel Core 2 Quad Q7600. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 9455P is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Quad Q7600 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
