Athlon XP-M 2000+ vs EPYC 9455P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 23 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 11.73 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Athlon XP-M |
| Power efficiency | 9.40 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Turin (2024) | Barton (2001−2004) |
| Release date | 10 October 2024 (1 year ago) | 17 June 2003 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,819 | $134 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9455P and Athlon XP-M 2000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 96 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.15 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 1.53 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 11.5 |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 8x 70.6 mm2 | 101 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 66,520 million | 54 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9455P and Athlon XP-M 2000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP5 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9455P and Athlon XP-M 2000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9455P and Athlon XP-M 2000+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9455P and Athlon XP-M 2000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9455P and Athlon XP-M 2000+.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 October 2024 | 17 June 2003 |
| Physical cores | 48 | 1 |
| Threads | 96 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 25 Watt |
EPYC 9455P has an age advantage of 21 years, 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 3150% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon XP-M 2000+, on the other hand, has 1100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9455P and AMD Athlon XP-M 2000+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 9455P is a server/workstation processor while Athlon XP-M 2000+ is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
