EPYC 9135 vs EPYC 9454

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9454
2022
48 cores / 96 threads, 290 Watt
53.56
+46.5%
EPYC 9135
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
36.56

EPYC 9454 outperforms EPYC 9135 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9454 and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2396
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.0129.26
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency17.4717.29
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Turin (2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,225$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9135 has 317% better value for money than EPYC 9454.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9454 and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads9632
Base clock speed2.75 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplier27.5no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm4 nm
Die size8x 72 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors52,560 million16,630 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9454 and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)290 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9454 and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9454 and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9454 and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9454 and EPYC 9135.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9454 53.56
+46.5%
EPYC 9135 36.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9454 85080
+46.5%
EPYC 9135 58070

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 53.56 36.56
Recency 10 November 2022 10 October 2024
Physical cores 48 16
Threads 96 32
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 290 Watt 200 Watt

EPYC 9454 has a 46.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 45% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9454 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 9135 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9454 and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9454
EPYC 9454
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9454 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9454 or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.