Ultra 9 386H vs EPYC 9384X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking82not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.86no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency13.70no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameGenoa-X (2023)no data
Release date13 June 2023 (2 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$5,529no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9384X and Core Ultra 9 386H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads64no data
Base clock speed3.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache768 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography5 nmno data
Die size8x 72 mm2no data
Number of transistors90,160 millionno data
64 bit support+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9384X and Core Ultra 9 386H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP5no data
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt + 18 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9384X and Core Ultra 9 386H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9384X and Core Ultra 9 386H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9384X and Core Ultra 9 386H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9384X and Core Ultra 9 386H.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 32 16

EPYC 9384X has 100% more physical cores.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9384X and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 9384X is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 386H is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9384X
EPYC 9384X
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Core Ultra 9 386H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 9384X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 9 386H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 9384X and Core Ultra 9 386H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.