Ryzen Z2 Extreme vs EPYC 9375F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9375F
2024
32 cores / 64 threads, 320 Watt
54.78
+264%

EPYC 9375F outperforms Ryzen Z2 Extreme by a whopping 264% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33492
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.23no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Power efficiency7.2042.19
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameTurin (2024)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025)
Release date10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,306no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Z2 Extreme basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads6416
Base clock speed3.85 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography4 nm4 nm
Die size8x 70.6 mm2no data
Number of transistors66,520 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Z2 Extreme compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP5FP8
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Z2 Extreme. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Z2 Extreme are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Z2 Extreme. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 890M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Z2 Extreme.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 9375F 54.78
+264%
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 15.05

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 9375F 95768
+264%
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 26313

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 54.78 15.05
Recency 10 October 2024 6 January 2025
Physical cores 32 8
Threads 64 16
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 9375F has a 264% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Ryzen Z2 Extreme, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 2033.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 9375F is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9375F is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Z2 Extreme is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9375F
EPYC 9375F
AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme
Ryzen Z2 Extreme

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 9375F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 41 votes

Rate Ryzen Z2 Extreme on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 9375F and Ryzen Z2 Extreme, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.